If it's going to take an expert witness to help Ronald J. Wendt beat the 12 felony charges against him, it's going to take money.
His attorney, Thomas Burns, says Wendt is "tapped out."
Sitting in jail, unable to earn money, Wendt cannot afford the thousands it would cost to bring in an expert in field sobriety tests and breathalyzers to help challenge the charge that he was driving drunk Aug. 12 when he was involved in an accident that took the life of Dansville teenager Katie M. Stanley.
County Attorney John Rizzo filed papers this week opposing a motion by Burns for the county to pay for the expert.
"I understand Mr. Rizzo's concern regarding the taxpayers," said Burns today, "but this is fundamentally at the heart of our defense. It is very important to us."
Wendt appeared in court today -- dressed in Genesee County Jail orange and with his head shaved -- for a hearing on motions by Burns that arresting officer Deputy Tim Wescott did not have sufficient probable cause to charge Wendt and to suppress statements made by Wendt to Wescott.
County Court Judge Robert Noonan denied both motions and set a date for a week-long trial.
Jury selection will start July 12 at 9 a.m.
Noonan set May 24 as the plea-offer cutoff.
District Attorney Lawrence Friedman said the offer he's made to Wendt is to reduce the aggravated vehicular homicide charge -- with a maximum penalty of 8 to 25 years in state prison -- to aggravated vehicular manslaughter. The reduced charge could still result in a more than two-year prison sentence, and up to seven years.
Burns said after the hearing that he expects the case to go to trial. The bottom end of the sentence on the first count of the indictment is one to three years, if Wendt were convicted by a jury.
Today, Westcott testified at length about the field sobriety test he conducted on Wendt following the late-night accident.
An expert witness would help Burns establish doubt as to whether the test conclusively proved that Wendt was driving drunk.
Wescott testified that he started with an eye-tracking test, which is designed to find possible nystagmus, which is an involuntary eye movement. Wescott testified that Wendt passed this test, saying that in order to determine that a driver has a BAC of at least .10, he will need to show four clues in the test and Wendt showed only two.
Friedman objected to Burns asking a series of questions about the eye-tracking test, but Noonan overruled the objection.
Wescott also testified that he had Wendt walk a straight line with the requirement that he take nine steps in each direction, heel-to-toe. Wescott said in his judgement, Wendt failed this test, missing four steps by an inch or less between his heel and toe going forward and raising his hands from his side on the return.
When it came to touching his nose, Wendt missed slightly on four of six tries.
On another test, where the suspect is asked to close his eyes, tilt his head back and try to estimate when 30 seconds had passed, Wendt said stop after 37 seconds. The standard deviation, according to Wescott, is five seconds.
More than an hour after the accident, Wendt submitted to a BAC test and reportedly tested at .08.
Wendt did allegedly make at least one incriminating statement early in the interview, Wescott testified. Wendt said, according to Wescott, "You might as well have me blow and take me to jail."
Noonan ruled that statement will be admissible at trial.
For previous coverage, click here.