In his State of the County address on Wednesday evening, County Legislature Chairman Ray Cianfrini said the City of Batavia has been "put on notice" about the county's desire to reduce how much sales tax revenue it shares with the city.
Reached later that evening, City Manager Jason Molino said, "I don't know where those comments are coming from because the City and the towns and villages have been very engaged in an open, constant and engaged discussion about these issues."
There is a working group of legislators, council members, along with two town supervisors and members of both county and city staff, who have been working diligently for months on a new sales tax agreement and water services agreement, Molino said. Cianfrini is a member of that oversight committee.
Molino shared with The Batavian a 42-page PowerPoint presentation titled "20 Identities ... One Genesee County Community" that goes into comprehensive detail about the process, timeline, history of the issues involved, and milestones that need to be reached to hammer out a new agreement covering how sales tax will be allocated and water issues handled.
Molino said he thought the whole process over the past several months has been cooperative and productive but repeated several times over the course of the conversation, "I just don't know where he's coming from."
The committee had seemed to be on the same page, he said, about reaching a mutually beneficial agreement, taking into account the shared needs -- which includes a possible new jail and infrastructure repairs for roads and bridges -- facing all of the municipal entities in the county.
"We made it very clear in the beginning that bridges and roads and a new county jail is more than just a county responsibility," Molino said. "It's all of our responsibility. There is an ownership responsibility that we all agree we must find a solution together. It's been a very cooperative process with the staff and oversight committee."
Currently, the county sales tax rate is 4 percent. That revenue is shared with the city and other municipalities in the county. The city gets 16 percent of that 50 percent and the other 34 percent is split among the other entities. The 10-year agreement expires in a year.
In his speech, Cianfrini said the county is facing some difficult financial issues in the future and suggested the county needs to keep more of the sales tax revenue for itself. He noted that Genesee County's share is more generous than Orleans, Livingston or Wyoming counties. He mentioned specifically the need to fund a potential new jail, a cost of $34 million to $42 million, and the backlog in repairs to roads and bridges, at a cost of $17 million.
"Negotiations for a new agreement began eight months ago, in July of last year, and the pace has been excruciatingly slow," Cianfrini said. "I can certainly understand the City’s desire not to have changes made to the agreement, but the needs of the county today and for the future are much different than they were when the last agreement was signed 10 years ago."
Cianfrini said changes need to be made that benefit the county.
"The county has put the city on notice that if a new agreement is not in place by February of next year, the county will consider the current sales tax sharing agreement to be terminated," Cianfrini said. "We await the results of the negotiations, but again, I want to be clear, time is of the essence and changes need to be made."
Among the milestones the oversight committee has agreed to, Molino said, is a review in May that will determine if any changes in the process need to be made. The May deadline was selected because if there is a new agreement, the state's comptroller needs six-months notice to implement changes.
The committee is also working on water supply issues for the county and the city, assessing the needs and challenges that may be faced in the future.
The document outlining the scope of work for the committee recognizes that are different goals and needs for the various entities involved, and each faces significant constraints, such as reduced staffing, the need not to increase property taxes and growing expenses. It also lays as a ground rule for the committee's work that everybody is going to have to give up something -- the people involved must focus on the big picture.
The oversight committee includes Cianfrini, legislators Bob Bausch and Marianne Clattenburg, council members Eugene Jankowski Jr. and Kathy Briggs, and representing the towns and villages are Darien Supervisor David Hagelberger and Bergen Supervisor Don Cunningham.
The working group, which meets regularly and reports back to the oversight committee, includes Molino, County Manager Jay Gsell, Assistant County Manager Matt Landers, Assistant City Manager Gretchen DiFante, County Highway Superintendent Tim Hens and City Director of Public Works Matt Worth.
If the process yields an agreement, the timeline for approval includes presentation to elected officials in each entity in June and approval by July.
"This was an approach that everyone bought into," Molino said. "Everyone is committed to a mutually beneficial agreement that benefits the towns and villages, the city and the county. Everyone bought into this and everyone was supportive of this process."
Mr, Cianfrini seems to have
Mr, Cianfrini seems to have just said he wants to cut the City, Towns and Villages share of the sales tax so the County does not have to raise property taxes and pass that cut onto the everyone else. The County looks good, and everyone else has to raise property taxes.
I live in the Village of
I live in the Village of Corfu, in the town of Pembroke. Both depend on their share of the sales Tax for budgetary survival. Must fight this money grab.
hire the lawyers and
hire the lawyers and arbitrator from the mall merchant / city law suits. together we can make these law firms wealthy.
Can't blame the county for
Can't blame the county for trying to control and not raising taxes. Why do the other 3 counties in the GLOW region get to keep so much of the tax revenue? Probably because they don't have a failed bureaucracy/city/county seat wasting so much of that revenue.
Ray Cianfrini is an over
Ray Cianfrini is an over zealous.. He tried to get his daughter in law into a more political position. He got his son perched into a political position under the republican cause. Now he tries to scare the city into what seems to be their good faith effort to make the county stonger. Someone is lying. Is it Molino or Cianifrini? You decide!
The City was only asking the
The City was only asking the current deal stay the same, no change. Mr. Cianfrini clearly wants more County spending, but does not want to raise taxes to pay for it. So, screw the City, Towns and Villages so that they have to raise property taxes to make up the loss.
And to make it worse, while Sales Taxes are paid by everyone equally, property taxes are not. All the tax exempt property and businesses that the County GCEDC have given breaks to, do not have to pay. That makes the burden on property owner greater because the local governments will have to make that up also
Good point, John. I didn't
Good point, John. I didn't hear Mr. Cianfrini talk much about cutting or saving any money, other than selling the old Engine House property and moving the HLOM to a non-profit, which are good things. It's all about finding more revenue so they can spend it and blaming it on state mandates. The mandates are of course a huge problem, but i believe there some other places to cut spending as well. The GCEDC breaks are still an illusion that they can foster prosperity through re-distribution of wealth. He still thinks that the STAMP project is going to save us all, pardon me if I'm more than a little cynical on that one. Like the song goes "I foresee terrible trouble, but I stay here just the same."
It seems there is a bit of
It seems there is a bit of tunnel vision at play here. Have you forgotten [perhaps intentionally so] that during the 2017 Budget negotiations and passage Legislators Cianfrini and Deleo, as well County Manager Gsell, were the only ones who didn't want to over-ride the cap, and didn't feel it necessary to raise taxes [they were willing to make more spending cuts]. THEY WERE OUTNUMBERED, by the other 7 Legislators who brought about a cap over-ride and thus increased taxes, and yet I've heard NO criticism and/or venting against any of those Legislators who are at fault for the tax increase. IMO there is an obvious and ignorant prejudice showing it's ugly head directed at Chairman Cianfrini [yea he is my cousin, but he knows well that I don't agree with him on all issues, and I will be outspoken when that happens].
I'd suggest that Chairman Cianfrini's State of the County message was not what he singularly wants, but rather a compendium of the basic areas of agreement of the Legislature. The people who participate in these discussions of local county politics need to get the picture in focus. There are 9 members who need to be scrutinized... not just one or two.