Some on here have claimed that the private insurance agencies are demonic. They deny care to those who need it. But did you know that according to the American Medical Association (AMA), Medicare is worse than Aetna, Anthem/BCBS, CIGNA, Coventry, Health Net, Humana, and United Healthcare (UHC)
In a report claiming that "Billions of dollars in administrative waste would be eliminated each year if third party-payers sent a timely, accurate and specific response to each physician claim", the AMA (who supports Obamacare) showed us that government is the biggest denier of care.
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/368/reportcard.pdf
This will only get worse as more people are forced into a system they don't want.
The Baucus bill which passed the Senate Finance Committee last week is going to tax "Cadillac" health care plans by 40%. But the definition of a "Cadillac" plan can be redefined on a whim. You will come to find out that most of you who have plans, have "Cadillac" plans. And of course most unions have these plans as well.
But then there is the other side of the coin.
"My husband retired from IBM about a decade ago, and as we aren't old enough for Medicare we still buy our health insurance through the company. But IBM, with its typical courtesy, informed us recently that we will be fined by the state.
Why? Because Massachusetts requires every resident to have health insurance, and this year, without informing us directly, the state had changed the rules in a way that made our bare-bones policy no longer acceptable. Unless we ponied up for a pricier policy we neither need nor want—or enrolled in a government-sponsored insurance plan—we would have to pay $1,000 each year to the state."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574459101022338232.html
That $1000 tax turns out to be cheaper to pay than to get the better coverage that they don't need.
There is also a provision similair to this in the Baucus bill.
What America needs now is to be thrifty and stop spending money that we don't have. We don't need more taxes that will take peoples income away. Income that could be used to to buy things people want instead of what is mandated by a bureaucrat in Washington who will not be subject to the provisions of the bill.
